PPSCR Logo

PPSCR

PPSCR Home
About Us
Research Team
Workshops
Projects
Course on CR
Student Research
Discussion Group
Publications
Upcoming Events
Contact Us
Site Search
Site Map

Search this web site


WORKSHOP ON THE CHALLENGE OF CONFIDENCE-BUILDING IN 21ST CENTURY: PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS FOR SOUTH ASIA

FEBRUARY 23-25, 2001

AT HOTEL REGENT PLAZA, KARACHI

MAIN POINTS EMERGING FROM THE DELIBERATIONS OF THE WORKSHOP

  • CBMs are also relevant and applicable in case of countries with normal and better relations. These are not only applicable between or among adversaries but have general relevance.
  • Although CBMs are considered as a Western concept but one cannot undermine its significance but these are a reality in building minimum trust and goodwill.
  • A major achievement of CBMs is that countries can avoid war.
  • South Asia does not have a structure to implement CBMs, which is a fundamental challenge to the application of this concept.
  • India's hegemonic position should be matched by Pakistan's arms buildup.
  • There is a need to bridge gap in theory and practice of CBMs by rationalizing the process of confidence building in South Asia. There is a need to move from rhetoric to rationality in formulating state policies.
  • Lack of proper interaction among people of India and Pakistan at the grassroots level is a major obstacle to the process of confidence-building in South Asia.
  • CBMs possess an image problem, which is a major impediment to build basic trust between adversaries. There exists mistrust in some circles about the concept of confidence-building measures.
  • CBMs is a Western concept, which is not relevant in developing world.
  • Concept of CBMs is as old as man.
  • Deterrence is a negative concept and CBMs a positive concept.
  • CBMs could be a process of facilitator to help resolve a conflict.
  • Fundamental question raised? We are afraid of peace. Are we afraid of war?
  • We should become a responsible enemy so as to help build minimum trust.
  • CBMs a process to avoid conflicts.
  • Atmosphere of dialogue in civil society essential to build confidence.
  • Main hurdle in the process of CBMs is the role of intelligence agencies.
  • South Asia could be regarded as a new frontier of U.S. policy and a fundamental American interest is to stop regional tension from escalating.
  • The U.S. must encourage people to people contacts and should deal with India and Pakistan on the basis of ground realities.
  • Ruling elites of South Asia are not encouraging the process of CBMs because of their vested interests and states are highly interventionist in their policies. Such a situation has created obstacles to building trust and confidence between and among South Asian countries.
  • Today South Asia is in the grip of negative nationalism, which is an obstacle to the CBM process.
  • Real peace process in Sri Lanka will come from within, although Norway, European Union, U.S. and India are playing a role in the Sri Lankan peace process.
  • Nuclearization of South Asia is not good for small states of the region. Small states of South Asia can play an important role in diffusing tension between India and Pakistan.
  • Nepal can be a bridge between India and Pakistan for the resolution of their conflicts.
  • India and Pakistan need to encourage a balanced approach in South Asia after the nuclear tests..
  • Lahore declaration was a model for Indo-Pakistan confidence building but was shattered because of the Kargil episode.
  • India's strategic objectives are not confined to South Asia but extends to other parts of Asia, including China.
  • Overplay of nuclear card by India and Pakistan.
  • Pakistan is using its nuclear option to compensate its conventional inferiority with India.
  • Overseas community of South Asians can play a meaningful role for influencing the CBM process in South Asia.
  • Role of violence in South Asia is a biggest hurdle in the process of confidence building and is now in the process of being institutionalized, particularly in Pakistani society.
  • Because of their hard line approach vis-à-vis the peace process, Jehadi forces are a major impediment against the CBM process. The only alternate to deal with the forces of extremism is to reduce the influence of Jehadi culture by establishing a democratic culture in South Asia.
  • Common enemy of the people of South Asia is poverty, illiteracy and unemployment etc.
  • Four capacities must be taken into account by India and Pakistan to build confidence viz:
  • a. Reality.
  • b. Patience.
  • c. Balance.
  • d. Responsibility.
  • Peace between India and Pakistan since 1971 could be regarded as a situation of "ugly stability."
  • Interaction between NGOs of South Asia essential to build confidence in the region.
  • Democratic character of state and society and balance between the two is required in order to promote the CBM process in South Asia.
  • Nehru's secularism and Gandhi's non-violence was turned into Hindu chauvinism in the 1980s.
  • Proper application of non-military CBMs will lead to better formation and execution of military CBMs. The problem of non-military CBMs is at the implementation level.
  • As compared to India and Pakistan, Sino-Indo CBMs are functioning more effectively.
  • SAPTA must be made more functional and SAARC can play an effective role for water sharing arrangements in South Asia.
  • Technology can be useful in building confidence in South Asia.
  • Media's ineffective role in building confidence in South Asia is because of weak role of intelligentsia.
  • The CBM process is in transition.

RECOMMENDATIONS

  • Institutionalizing and structuring the process of CBMs at the state and society levels required.
  • To promote viable, assertive, positive and meaningful role of education, media and civil society required to support the process of confidence-building in South Asia.
  • To bridge the gap in theory and practice of CBMs.
  • To bridge the gap between military and non-military CBMs in South Asia.
  • Role of violence be reduced so as to help the CBM process in South Asia.
  • Viable role of Non-Governmental Organizations required so as to facilitate people to people contacts and also to encourage exchange of professionals of India and Pakistan.
  • The catastrophic aspect of nuclear arms race between India and Pakistan needs to be stressed at the popular level.
  • Coherent strategy to deal with the phenomenon of negative nationalism required so as to create positive environment for confidence-building in South Asia.
  • To develop the expertise in promoting dialogue for confidence-building in South Asia.
  • Scope of CBMs should be broadened by bringing social issues.
  • Need to institutionalize Indo-Pak cooperation in the nuclear field, particularly in the area of nuclear energy. Holding of nuclear dialogue between New Delhi and Islamabad for establishing a nuclear restraint regime in South Asia is essential for peace and stability in the region.
  • Meaningful and effective trade and economic cooperation between India and Pakistan in particular and South Asian region in general is needed.
  • To effectively use technology for managing and reducing conflicts in South Asia.
  • Positive reporting of media about conflicts in South Asia, particularly between India and Pakistan is the need of hour for building confidence in the region.
  • To establish media channel in South Asia.
  • To promote greater interaction between media, civil society and academia for building confidence in South Asia.

TOP

Home | About Us | Workshops | Student Research | Discussion Group | Publications | Events | Site Map | Search | Contact Us 
Website designed & maintained by
TWT   |   Webmaster    |   Disclaimer