Welcome to Regional Information Base on Terrorism
     
Main Menu
· Home

Modules
· About RIBT
·
 AvantGo
· Downloads
· FAQ
· Members List
· Articles
· Recommend Us
· Reviews
· Search
· Sections
· Stats
· Submit Article
· Topics
· Top List
· Web Links
· Profiles
· Terrorist Events

For information or for any suggestions please contact info@ribt.org

       
   
 

The Coverage of Terrorism In Cyberspace – A Survey
By Faisal Khan


Introduction | Site by Site Analysis | Composite Analysis | Recommendations | Conclusion | Index of Sites

 
Introduction
As terrorism continues to occupy a central stage in global politics, there has been an increasing interest in and effort to historicize and analyze terrorism in the modern era. However, terrorism has been a difficult and complex subject for scholars and experts to grapple with. The foremost predicament for scholars and experts has been to compartmentalize terrorism in to a definition. There has never been a universal consensus on a definition of terrorism. Terrorism, therefore, is an undefined phenomenon and heavily influenced by the perspective of an individual or group that attempts to study it. A growing number of think tanks, academic center and government institutions have been studying and analyzing terrorism to better understand ultimately the reasons and causes of terrorism and the solution to a threat that is globalizing everyday. The information revolution that has accompanied the development of the internet has played a significant role in transforming how modern facts, ideas and beliefs are communicated, shared and accessed. Similarly, the study and coverage of terrorism has become part of the internet revolution where increasingly the many facets of terrorism are explored and presented through cyberspace. The purpose of the following study is to survey how institutions and organizations have attempted to systemize the study of terrorism through cyberspace and present it to their audience.

The Coverage of Terrorism in Cyberspace is an effort to survey and evaluate the current conglomeration of information and research on terrorism and terrorist organizations in cyber space. The survey assesses how successfully various organizations present and convey data, research and analysis on the issues of terrorism. The survey includes relevant websites both in the region of South Asia and around the globe. The main criteria for evaluation and assessment of these websites are as follows:

A. Presentation of Information
B. User friendly Navigation of Site
C. Transparency of Sources of Information
D. Objectivity and Accuracy of Data and Analysis
E. Diversity of Views, Analysis and Perspective (regional and political diversity of views, range of social sciences employed in analysis, perspective of the terrorists, counter-terrorist forces and the victims of terrorism)
F. The depth and detail of analysis on the issues of terrorism
G. The range of the varieties of terrorism examined
H. Geographical boundaries of research and analysis

The evaluation of the websites assesses the strength and weakness of information and analysis on terrorism in cyber space. The survey allows us to identify the important gaps in coverage of the issues of terrorism in cyber space. Having evaluated the quality the present collection of professional resources on terrorism in cyberspace, the survey concludes with recommendations of how a more comprehensive and objective source of information and analysis on terrorism can be presented through cyber space.

The survey material is exclusive in the range of websites it attempts to evaluate and analyze. Primarily the web space of prominent think tanks, government and non-governmental organizations is surveyed. However, among these, only those websites have come under scrutiny that maintains a substantial coverage on terrorism and the issues surrounding it. Propaganda based and non-professional web sites will be strictly excluded. The last date for data collection from the websites is November 15th, 2003 and changes thereafter have not been included in this survey.

Back to top
Site by Site Analysis

South Asia Terrorism Portal
Institute for Conflict Management, New Delhi, India
www.satp.org

Characteristics
A. South Asia Intelligence Review ( Weekly Assessments and Briefings)
B. Terrorism Update (daily)
C. Country Profile
i. Assessment
ii. Backgrounder
iii. Bibliography
iv. Documents (Acts & Ordinances, Papers)
v. Data Sheets
vi. Timelines
vii. Terrorist Groups
D. Quarterly Journal: Fault Lines: Writings on Conflict & Resolution
E. Northeast Portal, Database of Terrorism in Northeastern Indian
F. Annual South Asia Assessment
G. Map of Violent Conflict and Terrorism

Analysis
The South Asia Terrorism Portal, hosted by the Institute for Conflict Management in New Delhi, is a broad effort at documenting and analyzing the history of terrorism in the region of South Asia. The Portal provides a readily accessible data of terrorist events and terrorist groups on the following countries of South Asia: India, Pakistan, Nepal, Bangladesh, Bhutan and Sri Lanka. Primarily the site concentrates on a country by country data collection and analysis. Country profiles provide a number of different resources on terrorist events and issues about each particular country: assessment, backgrounder, bibliography, acts & ordinances, data sheets, timelines and terrorist groups. The site also provides a collection of data and analysis on terrorism in the Northeastern region of India: Jammu & Kashmir and maintains a database of terrorist events that have occurred in these states. A series of annual assessments of terrorism discussing the development of terrorist and counter-terrorist activities in the South Asia region is also published online regularly. Numerical data is complemented by maps of terrorist events, terrorist groups and conflicts in specific regions of South Asia. A wide collection of data and assessment is supplemented by a quarterly journal Faultines, published by the Institute for Conflict Management, which is accessible through the site. Faultlines, primarily a journal on conflict and resolution, provides a substantial analysis and scholarly discussion on the issues of terrorism in South Asia.

Although, the South Asia Terrorism Portal, on the surface, is an impressive user friendly resource on terrorism in South Asia, its entire collection of data, research and analysis is marred by lack of sources and references. The data sheets and timelines on each of the countries either have no sources listed or these listings are limited to vague phrases, “figures are compiled from news reports and provisional”, “constructed from media reports” or “compiled from English language media sources”. A number of data on violence is represented through graphs and maps. However, similarly no sources or references are listed for these representations.

The analysis in the form of country assessments, country backgrounders and briefings on terrorist groups are marred by lack of objectivity. A few analysis and descriptions I have sampled exemplify a subjective viewpoint and the Portal’s lack of sources only dissuades the reader in accepting these analysis as objective and factual. In India Assessment 2002, the writer states, “Available evidence, however, suggests that the Pakistani government continues its sponsorship of cross-border terrorism, and terrorism remains an instrument of its state policy.” and at another point in the same article it is stated, “In the eastern part of the country, in January 2001, the Army and intelligence agencies reportedly unearthed an ISI plot to convert North Bengal into a trouble spot, so that the Indian Army would have to maintain round-the-year deployment in the region.” However, through out India Assessment 2003, not a single source of information or intelligence is indicated. At the same time the analysis is adamant on a long range of generalizations and accusations that they themselves have failed to support through any evidence. Similarly in Pakistan Assessment 2003, the analysis states, “A series of high-intensity terrorist attacks during 2002 and in the first half of year 2003 in the Indian State of Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) and other States, all bore a clear Pakistani imprint”. Again, the analyst here has failed to elaborate what exactly a ‘Pakistani imprint’ signifies and is suggesting his vague and generalized statements as evidence of involvement of the Pakistani state.

In Bangladesh Assessment 2003, the analysts continue with these accusations and generalizations, with no clear source or evidence: “….Bangladesh has become a new safe haven and theatre of activities for the Al Qaeda and other Islamist fundamentalist groups, reports from Asian and Western intelligence services have suggested otherwise”, “The Bangladeshi Directorate General of Forces Intelligence (DGFI) in collaboration with the ISI and transnational Islamist groups, coordinate the activities of several Indian groups such as the United Liberation Front of Asom (ULFA), National Liberation Front of Tripura (NLFT), All Tripura Tiger Force (ATTF) and the National Democratic Front of Bodoland (NDFB).” Although the Institute for Conflict Management has managed to create a large collection of data, research and analysis on terrorism, the lack of sources and references leave its conglomeration of data and analysis shaky and unreliable, to say the least.


IPCS Terrorism Project
Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies, New Delhi, India
www.ipcs.org

Characteristics
A. News Reports on Terrorism with Daily Update
B. News Archive Database
C. Articles on Terrorism by Region:
i. Kashmir
ii. Northeastern India
iii. Sri Lanka
iv. Naxal Violence
D. Articles on Types of Terrorism
i. Nuclear Terrorism
ii. Chemical Terrorism
iii. Bio-Terrorism
iv. Suicide Terrorism
E. Panel Discussion and Seminar Transcripts

Analysis
The IPCS Terrorism Project, maintained by the Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies in New Delhi, is an analytic resource on issues of terrorism around the globe, with a particular concentration in certain regions of South Asia. The site provides daily news reports on terrorist events and issues around the globe from English national dailies and magazines from India, the South Asia region and the world. At the same time site maintains an easily accessible and searchable archive of these news reports. The other main feature of IPCS Terrorism Project is a collection of articles from scholars, experts and the IPCS staff on terrorism and the issues surrounding it. Firstly, a regional collection of articles is maintained concentrating in Kashmir, Northeastern India, Sri Lanka and Naxal Violence. Secondly, a collection of articles is maintained analyzing types of terrorism, particularly Nuclear Terrorism, Chemical Terrorism, Bio-Terrorism and Suicide Terrorism. The Project also provides a number of references and website links to other resources for information on terrorism.

However, IPCS primarily maintains a strictly analytic coverage of terrorism and its geographical range of coverage is also very limited in scope. The institute has not established a collection of statistical research on terrorist groups, terrorist events and counter-terrorist activities. They have relied on news reports for factual information on terrorism in Indian and Sri Lanka; however, most of this coverage is based on local and national newspapers of these regions. In spite of a limited geographical coverage and entirely analytic research, the institute has not made any substantial efforts at presenting a broader perspective on issues of terrorism. IPCS analysts largely limit themselves to examining the political and military challenges that terrorism poses whereas the economic and social implication of terrorism is largely ignored. Also the analysts concentrate more on policy proposals than analyzing current national and regional policies to combat terrorism. First of all, their geographical coverage is limited to India and Sri Lanka and even with in India only terrorism in Kashmir and Northeastern Indian states is covered. Even their news reports on terrorism are limited to the coverage of these regions. The IPCS Terrorism Project site also lacks a structured and user-friendly presentation. The division between regional analysis and topical analysis on terrorism is not clear and difficult to navigate. Research articles and papers on nuclear, chemical and biological terrorism are greatly limited in quantity as only a few outdated articles are available on the subject.
 

Terrorism and American Foreign Policy
The Brookings Institute, Washington D.C., USA
www.brookings.edu/terrorism

Characteristics
A. Policy Briefs
B. Analytics Papers and Commentary
C. Government Documents on Terrorism
D. Archive of audio, visual and printed transcripts of Brooking events on Terrorism
E. Resources:
i. The Role of the Press in the Anti-Terrorism Campaign
ii. Brookings Update on Terrorism e-mail alert

Analysis
Terrorism and American Foreign Policy, a project launched by the Brookings Institute in Washington D.C. in September 2000, is a large-scale effort at employing its reservoir of scholarly expertise to focus on exploring the immediate and long-term relationship between American foreign policy and international terrorism. The Brookings’ scholars primarily concentrate on generating regular policy briefs and analytic papers. The policy briefs examine and evaluate the American foreign policy initiatives to tackle the threat of terrorism to American soil and American interests, particularly since the attacks of September 11, 2001. The papers published under the project focus on exploring the different aspects of American strategies in counter-terrorism and the war on terrorism. A number of related issues the institute has explored are: America's military options for responding to terrorist attacks, using financial sanctions against countries that support terrorism, controlling financial support for terrorism, the role of an international coalition to combat terrorism and Pakistan's pivotal role in combating terrorism.

The institute maintains an easily accessible archive of audio, visual and printed transcripts of events Brooking has held for its project Terrorism and American Foreign Policy.. In the resource department, the institute’s project provides access to a reserve of government documents dealing with the issue of terrorism. Innovatively the project also presents the option for users to sign up for a web mail alert of terrorism updates. However, one of the unique and creative developments of the institute is The Role of the Press in the Anti-Terrorism Campaign, a weekly discussion series on news media issues growing out of the current anti-terrorism campaign. The discussion series is an effort to create an environment in which journalists and government officials can meet to discuss government-press problems and conflicting interests. Transcripts of discussions and interviews of press and government representatives are available on the site. The strength of the Brookings’ project Terrorism and American Foreign Policy emanates from the diversity of scholarly expertise the institute has directed towards the studying the relationship between terrorism and the American policy making. The wide range of expertise the institute has employed is apparent from the many research backgrounds these scholars come from: American Foreign Policy, Budge & Tax Policy, Central Asia, Defense & Homeland Security, East Asia, Economic Forecasting, Europe, Globalization and Trade, Middle East, Pakistan and India and Refugees. Also many of the scholars have experience at high levels in the national security structure of the United States.

However, the Brookings project essentially explores terrorism in the context of American policies and its counter-terrorism efforts. A large part of the research concentrates on America’s involvement in the war on terrorism and its implications. Beyond that nexus, the project fails to explore terrorism in a general context. Although the institute has engaged a diverse group of experts on the project, it has maintained at limiting its analysis and research to the nexus of terrorism and America. Even with in that nexus, the scholars are devoted exploring a strictly foreign policy perspective. A sociological perspective is lacking, where the nexus of terrorism and American or International society might be explored. Although, the project The Role of the Press in the Anti-Terrorism Campaign is a sign of the institute making an effort to expand its study, the project largely is limited to studying power relationships between the media and the government and the role of the public is hardily considered.


Terrorism Program
Center for Defense Information, Washington, D.C., USA
www.cdi.org/terrorism

Characteristics
A. Analytics Papers
B. News & Opinion Articles
C. Coverage by Issue:
i. Eye on Iraq
ii. Operation Enduring Freedom
iii. Responding to Terrorism
iv. Terrorist Network
v. Homeland Security
vi. U.S. Weapons Systems
vii. Foreign Policy & Security Strategy
viii. Legislation
ix. Arms Trade

Analysis
The Terrorism Program, a project of the Center for Defense Information in Washington, D.C., provides data and analysis on several different issues surrounding the United States’ effort in combating terrorism. The issues researched and analyzed by the program revolve around the military, security and foreign policy challenges to the United States in its fight against terrorism. The center has divided its research areas into the following sections: Eye on Iraq, Operation Enduring Freedom, Responding to Terrorism, Terrorist Network, Homeland Security, Foreign Policy and Security Strategy, U.S. Weapons Systems, Legislation and Arms Trade. The center explores these issues through regularly publishing a series of analytic papers and articles on the site by scholars, researchers and experts of the center. The section on Iraq, presents a regular war update and analysis of the main issues of the Operation Iraqi Freedom coupled with weather update, casualty reports and maps. Similarly, the ‘Operation Enduring Freedom’ section consists of a number of analytic papers and articles discussing the war in Afghanistan and the challenges for American policies and military strategy. The section ‘Responding to Terrorism’ generally addresses the challenges the United States faces in combating international terrorism, particularly the military and foreign policy challenges. Other than that a collection of articles also provide analysis and profiling of foreign terrorist organizations and a list of designated foreign terrorist organizations by the U.S. state department. A resource on military data and analysis in relation to American’s fight against terrorism is available through the sections ‘U.S. Weapons System’ and ‘Arms Trade’. The site also maintains a collection of news coverage from newspapers around the United States of various issues surrounding American military, security and foreign policy in relation to international terrorism by CDI experts and analysts.

The Center for Defense Information’s Terrorism Program, however, limits itself to a military, foreign policy and security analysis of the American fight against terrorism. Most of the news articles and analytic papers concentrate on exclusively exploring the military and security challenges to the United States. CDI analysts have largely ignored the wide range of social and economic implications for the United States as it tries to combat terrorism. More importantly the analysts lack in exploring how these economic and social implications affect the many facets of American military and foreign policy strategy they have discussed. Certainly, the center has limited itself to examining how the United States faces terrorism and does not expand its research geographically. The CDI’s resource also explicitly relies on its own experts and analysts, even for news coverage and it could attempt at accommodating a more diverse range of perspective on the issue of terrorism by including analysis and commentary of analysts and researchers outside of its staff. The CDI also maintains a very thorough profile and analysis of individual designated foreign terrorist groups. However, it has not pursued any comparative analysis of terrorist groups or even a comparative analysis of regional terrorism.


Transnational Threats Initiative
Center for Strategic and International Studies, Washington, D.C., USA
www.csis.org/tnt/index.htm
www.csis.org/tnt/rc/terror.html

Characteristics
A. Task Force:
i. Terrorism
ii. Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Terrorism
iii. Cyber Threats of the Future
iv. Information Warfare & Information Assurance
v. Russian Organized Crime
vi. Nuclear Black Market
vii. Asian Organized Crime
viii. Financial Crimes
ix. Global Narcotics Industry
B. Publications
C. Transnational Threats Update
D. Transnational Threats Resource Center

Analysis
The Transnational Threats Initiative, a project established by the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, D.C., aims at exploring the breadth, depth and impact of a variety of transnational threats. The center has formed an active syndicate of government and private sector expertise to formulate policy recommendations and solutions. These policy proposals are aimed at government and businesses to better prepare and response to transnational threats. The project, however, does not limit itself to terrorism, but also explores several other transnational threats like organized crime, financial crime and narcotics. The research and analysis of the institute suggests that there is a dynamic nexus of terrorism and transnational organized crime around the globe that needs to be investigated.

The project has organized several task forces of experts and scholars to explore a variety of issues on terrorism. The task force on Terrorism is assessing the impact of terrorist trends and developments on US and international security; exploring linkages between terrorism and global organized crime; and evaluating mechanisms and recommending improvements for deterring and responding to terrorism. However, largely the research and analysis concentrates on the transnational threat to the United States and the rest of the world is largely ignored. A task force on Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear terrorism is evaluating the current strategy of the United States on countering these threats and proposing a better long-term roadmap and strategy to counter these threats. Similarly task forces on Cyber Threats and Information Warfare are exploring the potential terrorist involvement in these threats and the strength of any counter-strategy the government has in place for these unconventional terrorist threats. A series of other task forces on international crime and narcotics industry explore the potential link between terrorism and global crime. The product of these task forces is available in the form of publications, however, only through sale and the site only provides publication briefs.

The Transnational Threats Initiative also provides monthly reports on terrorism, drug trafficking, organized crime, money laundering and most other transnational threats. Largely the monthly reports are the most accessible and comprehensive resource on the site. The project has also established a Transnational Threats Resource Center that provides congressional testimonies, select articles and op-ed pieces by its scholars and experts and limited news coverage of transnational crime and terrorism. However, the resource center is outdated and has not updated with current material since 1999. Most of the resources available on the site are analytic in nature and the center thus lacks a good source of statistical data on transnational crime, terrorist groups or terrorist events.

Terrorism Resource
Center for Nonproliferation Studies, Monterey Institute of International Studies,
Washington, D.C., USA

cns.miis.edu/research.terror.htm 

Characteristics
A. Agro-Terrorism
i. Chronology
ii. State Programs
B. Group Profiles
i. Al-Qaeda
ii. Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU)
iii. Al-Jihad al-Islami
iv. Al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya
C. U.S. Domestic Preparedness and Response to Terrorism
D. Weapons of Mass Destruction Terrorism
i. Article & Papers
ii. Database
iii. Chronology

Analysis
The Center for Nonproliferation Studies in California maintains a diverse resource on three types of terrorism: political terrorism, agro-terrorism and WMD Terrorism. The center with its expertise in nonproliferation studies aims at studying the relationship between the spread of weapons of mass destruction and terrorism. In its resource on agro-terrorism, the center has maintained a chronology of chemical and biological attacks targeting crops and livestock between the years 1915 to 2000. This list includes allegations and threats, along with confirmed incidents of deliberate use of chemical/biological weapons to destroy pre-harvest crops or livestock, in order to cause economic damage. Similarly, the center has also constructed a chart of state programs that have developed offensive capabilities with the potential of agricultural bio-warfare. The chart includes states that have developed or are suspected of developing biological agents with anti-livestock or anti-crop properties. The chart summarizes data available from several open sources. However, the center points out that the precise assessment of a state's capabilities is difficult because most bio-warfare programs were, and/or are, secret and cannot be independently assessed. A number of articles and commentaries are also available that discuss the threat of bio-terrorism and the methods to combat that threat.

For its resource on political terrorism, the center has developed group profiles of select terrorist organizations operating in Afghanistan namely: Al-Qaeda, IMU, Al-Jihad al-Islami and Al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya. The center’s resource on political terrorism is limited to seven articles on these groups and four of these articles only discuss the activities of Al-Qaeda. Also the collection of articles is not regularly updated since the last article on political terrorism was posted during December 2002. The site also provides a collection of congressional testimonies and research papers by the center’s experts on American security against and response to terrorism. However, largely these papers and testimonies revolve around the issues of bio-terrorism and the American strategy and response policy. Furthermore, the center also specializes in covering the issues surrounding WMD terrorism through a series of chronologies and a restricted access database. Complementing that is a collection of articles and interviews from newspapers and journals and occasional research papers by the center’s experts on WMD Terrorism.


Resource on Terrorism
Council on Foreign Relations, Washington D.C., USA
www.cfr.org/reg_issues.php

Characteristics
A. Terrorism: Questions & Answers:
i. Afghanistan
ii. What is Terrorism?
iii. Terrorist Groups
iv. State Sponsors of Terrorism
v. Havens for Terrorism
vi. Coalition States
vii. Weapons of Mass Destruction
viii. Homeland Security
ix. Causes of 9/11
x. Responses to 9/11
xi. Policy After 9/11
xii. War on Terrorism in 2002
B. Transcripts & Videos
C. Publications
D. Foreign Affairs Articles
E. Op-ed, articles and interviews

Analysis
The Council on Foreign Relations in Washington, D.C. maintains a comprehensive resource on terrorism in the form of a series of analytic and informational coverage on international terrorism, the war on terrorism and American security challenges in response to terrorism. The Council has engaged a variety of experts in analyzing the many dynamics of international terrorism, particularly U.S. policymaking in response to terrorism and homeland security strategy and policy. The analysis of experts and scholars are available in form of task force reports on the site, articles in its Foreign Affairs journal and general papers by its analysts. The site also provides news coverage of terrorism with a collection of updated op-ed, articles and interviews from America’s various newspapers. Although, the council has maintained a substantial and diverse analytic coverage of terrorism, it lacks in statistical coverage of terrorist attacks, war on terrorism and terrorist finances among many other issues.

The Council has also created an informational section of Questions & Answers, primarily aimed at providing a knowledgebase on the many issues of terrorism and the war on terrorism in a simplified form for the general public. The knowledgebase is presented in a form of twelve sections, listed above, with questions and answers to common issues and queries on terrorism. However, the council’s efforts for simplification of information have lead to many generalization of issues and explanations to answers that have been formulated. For example in the section on state sponsors, Syria is identified as a state sponsoring terrorism and possessing weapons of mass destruction. However, these explanations begin with an affirmative ‘yes’ and then move on to say the only source is the U.S. state department and their intelligence reports. The writer should have identified from the start that only according to these sources that these conclusions can be made about Syria. Certainly, the prolific use of U.S. state department source and intelligence reports in their statements and explanations is misleading itself for the reader, especially where a lot of the issues are controversial and statements accusatory. The Question & Answers section also holds a collection of weekly analysis of the war on terrorism during the year 2002 with covering events by region and issues.

Terrorism Research Center
Washington, D.C., USA
www.terrorism.com

Characteristics
A. Advisories
B. Country Profiles
C. News
D. Terrorist Profiles (Searchable Database)
E. Significant Events (Searchable Database)
F. Terrorist Attacks (Searchable Database)
G. Counter-Terrorism (Searchable Database)
H. Documents
I. Book Shelf
J. Topics
i. Research & Analysis
ii. Counter-terrorism Operations
iii. Homeland Security
iv. Information Warfare
v. Real News Items
vi. Reference Material
vii. Terrorist Groups

K. TRC Forum

Analysis
The Terrorism Research Center, an independent institute located in Washington, D.C., is exclusively devoted to the research of terrorism and counter-terrorism. The center maintains a network of terrorism and information warfare specialists drawn from industry, government, and academia around the globe. The strength of center’s site derives from its several extensive databases on: terrorist profiles, significant events, terrorist attacks and counter-terrorism operations. However, the online access to most of its database is restricted and available only on a subscription basis. Also in its database of terrorist group profiles several listings lacked content and at times failed to indicate sources.

The center also provides a frequently updated advisory and alert of terrorist threats in countries around the world. In addition, the center maintains a compilation of country profiles in specific relation to their experience with terrorism. Latest news coverage of terrorist events is available on the site from online news sources of the region. However, news items are in the form of links to online news sites and some of them are inaccessible or have restricted access. In its terrorism knowledgebase, the center maintains a number of articles and papers on a several topics related to terrorism: counter-terrorist operations, homeland security, information warfare and terrorist groups. However, by and large, these articles and papers focus on America’s involvement in facing the challenges of terrorism and ignore the rest of globe and their experience with terrorism. The center has also attempted to compile documents on several different topics of terrorism but they are not current and very limited in quantity. The site also provides a section of reference material for the study of terrorism and information latest books circulating on terrorism and the issues surrounding it. Moreover, the research center has created a discussion forum that provides a space for interested individuals to express their views and discuss in designated forums their opinions on a variety of issues of terrorism.


Anti-Defamation League
Washington, D.C., USA
www.adl.org

Characteristics
A. Articles & Papers:
i. International Terrorism
ii. Domestic Terrorism
iii. U.S. Response to Terrorism
B. Recent Press Releases
C. Terrorism Update: Periodic Report on Domestic and International Terrorism
D. Terrorist Organization Database ( link to ICT database)

Analysis
The Anti-Defamation League, an independent organization working against discrimination and particularly anti-Semitism, maintains a relevant compilation of online information and research on terrorism. Primarily, the site maintains a collection of articles and papers on three particular topics: international terrorism, domestic terrorism and U.S. response to terrorism by ADL analysts and external sources. Nearly all of the articles and paper under international terrorism cover only terrorist events and issues pertaining to the Middle East or groups based in the Middle East. The section on domestic terrorism covers internal U.S. terrorist threats and terrorist groups. However, this section consists of only five articles and has not been updated recently. Similarly, the section on American response to terrorism articles covers American policy and strategy to combat terrorism. This section is also inadequate in coverage as it holds only five articles and does not provide current coverage of American responses to terrorism. Unfortunately, many of the articles contain no indication of sources or references and therefore are an unreliable resource.

Furthermore, the site maintains an archive of international and domestic press releases on terrorism. However, these press releases are only ADL’s official affirmation of its positions on issues or events related to terrorism and are not sufficient as coverage of terrorism. The ADL also provides a link to the International Policy Institute for Counter-Terrorism’s database on terrorist organizations and terrorist attacks. One of the more comprehensive coverage ADL provides a period publishing of reports on domestic and international terrorism. The report presents analysis of emerging threats, counter-terrorism efforts and terrorist attacks against the United States and Israel.


Asia Terrorism Database
Asia-Pacific Institute, American Foreign Policy Council, Washington, D.C., USA
www.afpc.org/td.shtml

Characteristics
A. Asia Terrorism Database:
i. Indonesia
ii. Philippines
B. Event Transcript and Report

Analysis
The Asia Terrorism Database, a project of the Asia-Pacific Initiative of the American Foreign Policy Council in Washington, D.C., aims at providing a history and chronology of terrorist organizations and their activities throughout the Asia-Pacific region. However, the coverage of the database is limited to the profiling of select terrorist groups in Indonesia and the Philippines. In the case of Indonesia, background and activities of the following terrorist organizations are available: Aceh Merdeka and Jemaah Islamiah. In the coverage of the Philippines the background and activities of the following terrorist groups are available: New People’s Army, Abu Sayyaf Group and Moro Islamic Liberation Front.

The range and depth of information about these terrorist groups that the council has compiled is scarce and does not mention vital details about leadership and significant events of these groups. In addition facts, figures and statistics used for the profiling of these groups are only erratically supported by sources. For example in the profile of the group New People’ Army (NPA), the first part of information is supported by state department documents, however, the rest of the details have no reference or sources listed. Similarly, in the profiling of the group Aceh Merdeka the writer mentions that the ‘Associated Press reports, however, the two sides left the issue of disarming the province to further negotiation’ but the date and year of that report is not cited. The Council’s negligence of identifying sources leaves its limited research of a significant region insubstantial and unreliable. The site also holds a few transcripts and reports of events and activities the Asia-Pacific Initiative has held in regards to international terrorism.


Inter-American Committee against Terrorism
Organization of American States
www.cicte.oas.org

Characteristics
A. Counter-Terrorism Legislation
B. Documents, Resolution & Conventions: CICTE Committee & UN Session
C. Event Transcripts and Briefs
D. Database: Resource Material on Terrorism

Analysis
The Inter-American Committee against Terrorism, an initiative of the Organization of American states, maintains a resourceful database of legislations, treaties and conventions of member states, international organizations and select states around the globe. The database contains excerpts of national legislation of member states regarding terrorism and legislative examples from other nations of the world. In addition draft legislations from related international organizations such as the OAS-CICAD, the Commonwealth Office, the United Nations and other appropriate agencies are available. The database also contains excerpts of regional and multi-regional treaties and conventions related to terrorism. Furthermore, the database offers access to contact information on area experts of various fields related to the fight against terrorism. Information on training courses, academic research and institutions involved in efforts to counter-terrorism is also available through the database. However, the database lacks statistical records of terrorism and terrorist groups and exclusively deals with counter-terrorism, organizations involved in counter-terrorism and research on counter-terrorism. The database is noticeably lacks coverage of the many dimensions of international terrorism and even of terrorism in North and South America.

The site also has a compilation of listings of current counter-terrorism legislations of North American and South American states in the following areas: Chemical & Biological Weapons, National Security, Financial Controls, Immigration Controls, Penalties for Terrorist Offences and Transportation & Aviation Control. Similarly the site maintains a compilation of documents, resolutions and conventions of CICTE Committee and UN Session regarding terrorism and counter-terrorism issues. In addition select transcripts and briefs of CICTE events are also available.


Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism
Oklahoma, USA
www.mipt.org

Characteristics
A. First Responders: Responder Knowledgebase
B. Research
C. Lessons Learned
D. Library
E. Victims Assistance
F. Database: Terrorism Incidents & Significant Dates Database
G. Bibliography

Analysis
The Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism, a non-profit corporation in Oklahoma, maintains an online knowledge base of research in social and political causes and effects of terrorism. The Institute is also involved in the study of terrorism involving chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear weapons of mass destruction. The Institute also dedicates a large area of research to develop equipment, training and procedures that assists first responders in preventing terrorism and responding to it.

The Responder Knowledgebase has been built specifically to serve the needs of emergency responders dealing with terrorism. It contains information on currently available products, along with a wealth of related information such as standards, training, and grants for chemical, biological, nuclear and radiological attacks. The knowledgebase, however, is lacking in providing similar information for militant terrorism. The knowledgebase also has a storage of articles and reports evaluating responder activities and discussing various issues around responder training, funding and standards. In addition, references to publications and links to related sites on emergency responders are available on the site. Another section of the site ‘Lessons Learned’ hosts a compilation of the best practices and lessons learned from actual terrorist events and various national, state, and local training exercises collected, catalogued and analyzed in the form of reports and articles. Similarly, another section of the site on victim assistance provides reports and information on legislative and medical support to victims of terrorism. The Responder Knowledge mainly concentrates on counter-terrorism knowledge and strategy from the perspective of attacks and threats to the United States and could have greatly benefited in exploring the counter-terrorism knowledge and strategy of other nations and regions.

The research area of MIPT’s site documents the various programs and workshops the Institute has held through a collection of transcripts and reports. Additionally, press releases of MIPT sponsored counter-terrorism research are also available. The institute also maintains an extensive online library of reports, articles and various studies on terrorism and counter-terrorism. Some of the many areas the library provides resources on are: agricultural terrorism, chemical & biological terrorism, cyber terrorism, critical infrastructure protection, domestic legislation, federal funding for security and counter-terrorism, nuclear terrorism and aviation security. The library provides access to a bibliography of material on terrorism and counter-terrorism.

The MIPT, in collaboration with RAND Corporation, also hosts a number of broad databases. Viewers are provided with access to three MIPT-sponsored databases: RAND Terrorism Chronology, RAND-MIPT Terrorism Incident Database and MIPT Indictment Database. The first two databases were compiled by the RAND Corporation, of which the RAND Terrorism Chronology Database records international terrorist incidents occurring between 1968 and 1997, while the RAND-MIPT Terrorism Incident Database records domestic and international terrorist incidents occurring from 1998 to present. The MIPT Indictment, that is supposed to provide a record of terrorist court cases that have taken place in the U.S. since 1978, is currently unavailable through the site. The first two databases that are accessible allow the user to search and retrieve terrorism data, detailed descriptions and statistical analysis. Users have options to view predefined reports, access graphical summaries, create and execute their own queries and search the database using different types of keyword searches.


Terrorism and Homeland Security
RAND Corporation, California, USA
www.rand.org/terrorism_area

Characteristics
A. News Room: Op-ed and Commentary
B. Project Briefings
C. Congressional Testimony: Terrorism and Security
D. Bio-Terrorism: Research and Commentary
E. Online Publications on Terrorism

Analysis
The Rand Corporation maintains, as part of its research area on terrorism, an online resource of analytic material on terrorism and homeland security. The main analytic resources are a collection of opinion articles, editorials and commentaries published by Rand’s staff in a number of American newspapers and journals. These writings mainly explore issues of domestic and international security in relation to the challenges posed by international terrorism. The analysts also provide commentary on the debates and issues on the war on terrorism, particularly the role of the United States. However, the analysts have limited themselves to a security perspective whereas the social and economic consequences of international terrorism and the war on terrorism are largely unexplored. Similarly, the Corporation also devotes a section to a collection of commentaries and papers on bio-terrorism that explores types of bio-threats, domestic preparedness against bio-terrorism and the immediacy of a bio-threat.

A site also offers a compilation of congressional testimonies on homeland security, biological terrorism, the September 11 attacks on the United States and the war on terrorism. Similarly, select publications of Rand are available online that mainly explore issues of homeland security, bio-terrorism and challenges of international terrorism. Project briefings, also available through the site, describe a number of issues related to terrorism that Rand analysts and experts are exploring.


Resource on Terrorism
Foreign Policy in Focus, Washington, D.C., USA
www.fpif.org/indices/topics/terrorism

Characteristics
A. Commentary
B. Policy Briefs & Reports

Analysis
Foreign Policy in Focus, a collaborative think tank of analysts around the world, provides a unique online resource of reports and commentary by analyst and advocates from different regions of the world. FPIP’s ability utilize a broad group of analysts allows it to provide a diverse range of opinions and perspectives on issues of foreign policy and terrorism. Policy reports available through site concentrate mainly on analyzing and evaluating specific American policy initiatives response to international terrorism and particularly in the post-September 11th scenario. The commentaries, however, are more broad based and discuss how government’s around the world are tackling domestic, regional and international terrorism. The collection of policy reports and commentaries particularly investigate the various issues surrounding the war on terrorism.

However, the site is current in the coverage of terrorism only till October 2003 and the significant events that have taken place during the November 2003 are unaccounted for. Also although FPIF has managed to draw on a broad group of analysts and advocates, the analysis is largely limited to political issues surrounding terrorism. The wide range of economic and social issues that are at times even related to political developments, have been ignored.


Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Washington, DC, USA
http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/ 

Characteristics
A. Opinions, Editorials and Articles
B. Policy Watch
C. Congressional Testimony

Analysis
The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, a think tank dedicated to research and analysis of American interests in the Middle East, supports a collection of online resources on terrorism. A collection of opinion papers, editorials and articles published in various journals and news papers in the United States by senior analysts of the institute are available on the site. These writings mainly discuss the dynamic of terrorism originating from the Middle East and the challenges that it poses to the United States. However, these writings are not current and do not cover the last few months of significant development in international terrorism, specifically in the Middle East.

The section on Policy Watch is a collection of policy reports and analysis by analysts at the institute and outside expert of particular policies formulated and adopted by the United States as it tries to combat the many facets of terrorism. Similarly a listing of congressional testimonies by senior fellows of the institute is available on the site. The testimonies only provide coverage between the years 2001 and 2002.


International Policy Institute for Counter-Terrorism
Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya, Herzliya, Israel
www.ict.org.il

Characteristics
A. International Terrorism:
i. Terrorist Organization Profiles
ii. Terrorist Attack Database (1986 – Present)
iii. State Sponsored Terrorism
iv. Financing Terrorism
v. Non-Conventional Terrorism
B. Arab-Israeli Conflict:
i. Terrorist Organization Profiles
ii. Terrorist Attack Database (1988 – Present)
iii. Current Fatality Statistics of Palestine-Israeli Conflict
iv. Palestine-Israeli Peace Process
C. Counter-Terrorism:
i. International Activity
ii. Israeli Activity
iii. Terrorism Law
D. News Update
E. Articles
F. Documents

Analysis
The International Policy Institute for Counter-Terrorism maintains a comprehensive online analytic and statistical resource on various issues of domestic and international terrorism. The ICT’s website is primarily divided in to three main areas of coverage: International Terrorism, Arab-Israeli Conflict and Counter-Terrorism. The section on International Terrorism consists of five different resource areas: terrorist organization profiles, terrorist attack database, state sponsored terrorism, financing terrorism and non-conventional terrorism. The terrorist organization profiles and the terrorist attack database provide a historical coverage of international terrorist groups. The profiles document the origins, ideology, leadership, tactics and finance of these groups while the database provides access to their activities. However, the information contained in the profiles is erratic. A number of organizations are incompletely profiled. In addition, sources for a number of profiles are not identified while others have references to profile compilations of other online databases. The database covers only the period from 1986 to the present. The section on state-sponsored terrorism provides articles, papers and documents related to six countries that the institute classifies as sponsoring terrorism. These six countries are: Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, Sudan and Syria. Background information on Syria and Iran are without any sources or references. Similarly, a number of articles and papers lack sources for data and statistics that have been mentioned. The section on financing terrorism is makes use of a collection of news articles to document the methods and tactics employed by international terrorist groups for sponsoring terrorist activity and the probable sources of their finance. The last section on non-conventional terrorism explores through a series of articles by ICT researchers and documents the threat and likelihood of nuclear, chemical, biological and cyber terrorism. Also a background on the history and definition of all these different types of non-conventional terrorism is provided.

The section on Arab-Israeli conflict is divided in to four resource areas: terrorist organization profiles, terrorist attack database, current fatality statistics of the Palestine-Israeli conflict and the Palestine-Israeli peace process. The profile and the database document the activities and history of the various terrorist organizations operating in Israel and Palestine. Again the sources for the profiling of the Palestinian organizations have not been identified. The database covers the activities of these groups from 1998 to the present. Another section provides a statistical analysis of fatalities in the Palestine-Israeli conflict between years 2000 and 2003. The last section on the Palestine-Israeli peace process consists of a collection of news items and documents related to the various aspects of the Arab-Israeli conflict.

Resources on counter-terrorism are provided through a collection of documents of U.N. resolutions and International Treaties. Similarly, a collection of international and national legislation is available. The last section of counter-terrorism discusses the history, method and objective of the Israeli activity to control and eliminate terrorism. All of the sections namely: International Terrorism, Arab-Israeli Conflict and Counter-Terrorism each maintain news updates, articles and documents related to the various issues of each area.


Cato Institute
Washington, D.C., USA
www.cato.org

Characteristics
A. Bio-Terrorism
B. Terrorism and Civil Liberties
C. Terrorism and Foreign Policy
D. Defense Issues and Terrorism
E. Iraq War
F. Afghanistan War
G. Political and Terrorism
H. Terrorism and Economy
I. Homeland Security

Analysis
The Cato Institute maintains an online resource of its research area in terrorism. The online resource on terrorism contains a number of sub-sections: bio-terrorism, terrorism and civil liberties, terrorism and foreign policy, defense issues and terrorism, Iraq war, Afghanistan war, politics ad terrorism, terrorist and the economy and home land security. Each section contains a number of opinion articles and commentaries by Cato’s analysts discussing the various issues of each subject. In addition, policy briefings and analysis by Cato analysts is available on these subjects. The institute also maintains a collection of audio and visual material of television appearances of its staff in regards to issues of terrorism. Transcripts of events of the institute related to terrorism are also available online.

However, Cato mainly concentrates on a collection of analytic information on terrorism and lacks in research for statistical data and analysis. Moreover, the institute only maintains a selective news update of the Iraq war and news related to other issues and facets of terrorism and counter-terrorism are not available.

International Terrorism
International Crisis Group
www.intl-crisis-group.org

Characteristics
A. Articles
B. Commentary
C. Speech Transcripts
D. Report & Briefings
E. Media Releases

Analysis
The International Crisis Group, a multinational non-profit organization, maintains an online analytic resource of its program on international terrorism. Articles and commentary by ICG analysts provide coverage of and perspective on a number of issues related to the consequences of terrorism and method of counter-terrorism adopted by states. The speech transcripts provide excerpts of views on terrorism by analysts of ICG. The reports and briefings provide country specific analysis of terrorism, terrorist groups and state responses to terrorism. Media releases provide select coverage of terrorism in regions the ICG is involved and identifies the ICG’s standpoint on particular issues.

The ICG website is lacking in any statistical analysis of terrorism. Additionally, the analysts primarily concentrate, probably because of their expertise, on terrorism originating in the Middle East, Central Asia and South East Asia. Also the quantity and range of analysis and reports is limited.


Center for Defense and International Security Studies
Lancaster, England, United Kingdom
www.cdiss.org

Characteristics
A. Database of Terrorist Events: 1945 -1998

Analysis
The Center for Defense and International Security Studies maintains an online database of major terrorist events throughout the world during the period 1945-1998. The database is divided into a decade by decade records of terrorist event in particular countries. These collected incidents provide a snapshot of the wide-range of terrorist attacks and political violence experienced worldwide since World War II. However, the CDISS only provides a minimal description of the events and their background. Although a substantial statistical collection of terrorist events, it is not comprehensive in any sense and only selective in documenting terrorist attacks. The center also does complement its collection of data with any analysis or commentary.


Center for International Security and Cooperation
Institute for International Studies, Stanford University, California, USA
http://cisac.stanford.edu/docs/nuclearterrorism.html  

Characteristics
A. Background
B. Fact Sheet
C. CISAC Reports
D. Articles
E. Recent Newspaper articles and op-ed: Nuclear Terrorism

Analysis
The Center for International Security and Cooperation maintains an online resource on nuclear terrorism. The resource consists of a background on nuclear terrorism and supplemental fact sheets that provide information on various aspects of nuclear terrorism, including answers to many of the most frequently asked questions about radiation, dirty bombs, and nuclear explosions. They also include information on what the public can do to both prepare for and work to prevent these types of attacks.

Additionally, CISCAC reports discuss the how the public can access advisory information in the case of a nuclear attack and better communicate with source of information. Reports also discuss how to apply existing technology and resources most effectively to prevent the transport of illicit nuclear materials for use in terrorist activities by means of international commercial shipping. However, the reports are lacking in identifying the likelihood of nuclear attacks and probably origin of these attacks. A number of article and op-ed pieces are available that discuss many issues surrounding a nuclear terrorist attack.

Back to top


Composite Analysis

The survey of twenty online resources on terrorism maintained by different think tanks, non-profit organizations and government sponsored institutes has provided us with a substantial understanding of the coverage of terrorism in cyber space. A concerted effort has been made by prominent organizations and institutes to maintain a variety of online resources on terrorism. The general purpose of these online terrorism resources has been to document their study of terrorism and utilize cyberspace for storing and disseminating research and analysis.

One of the major strengths of the coverage of terrorism through the internet is the wide variety of analysis and commentary presented through the majority of the sites I have surveyed. There are two categories of analytic coverage that is available through these sites. The first one can be categorized as original coverage that is mainly the research and writing of the institute’s own staff and affiliated members. The other category is the storage of references and resources that particular sites have maintained. A number of sites have collaborated analytic and statistical material of other think tanks and analysts and thus have established a broader and more representative coverage. This method of presenting a collaboration of original work and a collection of resources of analytic work greatly enhances the breadth and depth of analysis, commentary, reports and viewpoints that are available on various issues of terrorism. The analytic coverage, however, is particularly strong in the area of security, military and foreign policy perspective. The majority of the sites are established by organizations that primarily study security, military and foreign policy issues in the global political scenario. Therefore, the analytic coverage as a whole is comprehensive in exploring and presenting the military, security and foreign policy issues that arise internationally and within nation-states as the threat of threat terrorism augments. However, at the same time it fails to broaden its perspective by embracing the method of study and viewpoint of other social sciences and academic disciplines.

One factor that greatly limits the geographical boundaries of research and analysis is that the majority of organizations and institutes that have developed sites studying terrorism are based in the United States. These sites largely concentrate on analyzing the military, security and foreign policy implications for the United States as it faces the challenge of international terrorism. Unfortunately, the some of most comprehensive and renowned institutes like the Brookings Institute, Council on Foreign Relations, the Center for Strategic and International Studies and the Cato Institute are all based in the United States. These sites, among many others, primarily and at times exclusively, devote their online resources to present how international terrorism affects the United States and how it is politically and militarily fighting against terrorism. As a result, there is a lack of research and analysis about how terrorism has transformed global political relations and economic progress. Similarly, there is not enough coverage of terrorism prone regions like the Middle East, South Asia and Central Asia and how states of these regions are dealing with international and domestic terrorism.

Among the twenty sites surveyed there are only five sites that maintain a substantial and comprehensive database on terrorism: South Asia Terrorism Portal, Center for Non-Proliferation Studies, Terrorism Research Center, Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism and the International Policy Institute for Counter-Terrorism. The databases vary in nature, from databases of terrorist attacks and terrorist group profiles, to a database on weapons of mass destruction terrorism by CNS and regional terrorism databases of ICT. Therefore, the wide majority of websites on terrorism have not compiled a database which is indicative of the fact that there is a general lack of statistical coverage and analysis on terrorism. The survey illustrates that the majority of sites primarily focus on presenting papers, articles, reports and commentaries. Even of the sites that have maintained databases, some of them have restricted access and others are marred by good citation of sources.

The coverage of a number of sites is marred by lack of sources and references for the information and data they have cited. The ICT and SATP are two of the more prominent ones that fail to provide a clear indication of sources and references. Although both of them have managed to provide an extensive online resource of analytic and statistical material on terrorism, the lack of sources leaves a lot of their research and information unreliable and subjective. A number of sites are also lacking in current and updated information. Several of the sites I have surveyed have not updated their periodic reports or news coverage. Some sites are not current in following current developments regarding terrorism and their analysis and data lacks of coverage of recent events and issues.


Back to top

Recommendations

General Recommendations
The survey has allowed us to explore how research and analysis on terrorism by various think tanks and research centers is presented in cyberspace. The site by site analysis and the composite analysis has provided us with an in-depth understanding of the scope of research and information on terrorism throughout cyberspace. My evaluation has allowed me to formulate a number of recommendations on how the current coverage of terrorism in cyberspace can be improved. Similarly, I will also attempt to identify some gaps that are visible in the current cyber coverage of terrorism, based on my analysis and evaluation.

One of the main limitations of the coverage of terrorism in cyberspace is one of a limited perspective. The majority of the organizations studying terrorism are primarily involved in the study of national and international military, security and foreign policy issues. Most of these institutes approach the study of terrorism as a military and security challenge for international and national political structures. A number of them explore the foreign policy implications for states as terrorism emerges as a threat in global order. Although a political science understanding of terrorism is central, by itself it is lacking in attempting to comprehend and communicate the nature of terrorism in the modern world. There are a number of questions about terrorism that political science alone cannot answer. Therefore, a number of other social sciences and academic disciplines like sociology, anthropology, history, economics, and violence studies and so on are essential to explore the phenomena of terrorism comprehensively. The institutes and organizations that are presently involved in providing coverage of terrorism on the internet should divert resources to embrace other sciences and disciplines to understand terrorism and provide solutions to the challenges that terrorism poses. Certainly, terrorism is not an isolated phenomenon that only affects military, security and policy structures of states.

As I mentioned in my composite analysis, the majority of the online coverage on terrorism is provided by organizations based in the United States and as a result their analysis revolve around the national interests and goals of the United States. There is a need to broaden the study of terrorism in cyberspace through providing analysis from perspective of other regions and states around the globe. Some of the key regions where terrorism is increasingly a fundamental issue are the Middle East, South Asia and Central Asia. Analytic and statistical coverage is needed of these regions and how particular states like Egypt, Pakistan, India, Afghanistan, Turkey and so on are devising methods and policies to combat terrorism. Although the cyber coverage is replete with military, security and foreign policy analysis, it mainly deals with the United States and there is a need to broaden that coverage geographically.

Organizations involved in the coverage of terrorism in cyberspace should also build a wider and easily accessible resource of statistical information on terrorist events, terrorist organizations, legislations related to terrorism, casualties of terrorist events and so on. Only a few sites have dedicated substantial resources to accumulating and presenting statistical information. Statistical information is key in the coverage of terrorism. Particularly the statistical coverage of terrorist events is vital to the research on terrorism since the majority of background and intelligence information on terrorism is classified, unreliable or unattainable. Also a chronology of global, regional and national terrorist events is required on the internet coverage to enhance statistical coverage and data. Similarly, another key component of data collection should be a database of organizations studying terrorism and counter-terrorism. There is a need in the research and study of terrorism to compartmentalize and publicize through the web the resources available to understand and explore terrorism.

Recommendations for the Regional Information Base on Terrorism
The survey ‘The Coverage of Terrorism in Cyberspace’ began as a background research study for the web project ‘Regional Information Base on Terrorism’ developed by the Program on Peace Studies and Conflict Resolution. The survey has allowed me to analyze and evaluate the current coverage of terrorism through the internet and accordingly I have formulated a number of recommendations for the RIBT project.

An on going project, the RIBT is a regional coordinated project that attempts to build a comprehensive online resource on terrorism in South Asia. The primary goal of the project is to build a regional database of terrorist events and organizations and chronology of terrorist events in South Asia. Thus, the RIBT project is fulfilling a number of deficiencies in the cyber coverage of terrorism that I identified in the general recommendations. It is building a substantial statistical coverage of terrorism and embracing the study of terrorism in South Asia, thus extending the present geographical coverage of terrorism in cyberspace. At the same time it is maintaining an objective resource of information by creating an active regional coordinating and monitoring committee that will share their regional expertise on terrorism for the project.

One of the areas that RIBT should concentrate in its analytic coverage is counter-terrorism, especially the role of the state and state agencies. There is a need to provide research on the method and policy states, outside the westerns hemisphere, are adopting to combat international and domestic terrorism. Similarly the military, security and foreign policy methods adopted by states in this region should be analyzed. One of the key areas, which are scantily covered on the web, is legislative research. There is need to present the legislative process of states and international organizations in relation to terrorism. An online reservoir of legislations on terrorism by states and international organizations should be made and accordingly an analysis of the legal battle against terrorism that has increased recently should be made.

Although RIBT is project of an organization that primarily is involved political science analysis like most others studying terrorism, it should nevertheless attempt to diversify its study. Other social sciences and academic disciplines should be embraced in the analysis of terrorism. Analysts and experts from the fields of economics, history, violence studies, sociology and anthropology should be utilized in exploring terrorism from a diverse range of perspectives.

In addition, RIBT should also attempt to maintain overtime a database of organizations in South Asia and around the globe that are involved in the research and study of terrorism. The database would complement greatly other databases RIBT is creating and will be very resourceful for researchers and analysts in the region and around the globe. In its analytic coverage, other than news and articles, RIBT should also attempt to present periodic reports on terrorism in the region as a whole and reports on particular states. Reports could cover the terrorist events that occurred in the period, the action of the states and news issues that have arisen in relation to terrorism.  


Back to top

Conclusion
In conclusion, our survey on the coverage of terrorism in cyberspace has allowed us to explore how various think tanks, non-profit organizations and government sponsored institutes have presented a reservoir of analytic and statistical resources on terrorism through cyberspace. The study of terrorism has certainly been systemized on the internet as it becomes a vital source of accessing and disseminating information. Our analysis and evaluation, however, shows us that the coverage of terrorism in the internet has yet to assume the magnitude and substance as terrorism has assumed in our political, economic and social lives I think one of the reasons for the lack of a more comprehensive and diverse coverage of terrorism on the web is the misperception of the role of the internet. The organizations and individuals studying terrorism should recognize the internet as a professional base of information accession and dissemination. The same professionalism and resources should be directed towards publishing information on the web and creating accessible resources as organizations divert towards printed publishing. The internet as a gateway of information without boundaries can play a crucial role in understanding terrorism in the 21st century, a phenomenon that is also increasingly breaking all political, social and economic boundaries.

Back to top
Index of Web Sites
1. Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies, New Delhi, India
www.ipcs.org
2. South Asia Terrorism Portal, Institute for Conflict Management, New Delhi, India
www.satp.org
3. The Brookings Institute, Washington D.C., USA
www.brookings.edu/terrorism
4. Information Terrorism Project, Washington D.C.., Center for Defense USA
www.cdi.org/terrorism/ 
5. Center for Nonproliferation Studies, Monterey Institute of International Studies, California, USA
http://cns.miis.edu/research/terror.htm 
6. Transnational Threats Initiative, Center for Strategic and International Studies, Washington D.C., USA
www.csis.org/burke/hd/index.htm 
7. Council on Foreign Relations, USA
www.cfr.org/ 
www.terrorismanswers.com/index
8. Interdisciplinary Center, Herzliya, Israel
www.ict.org.il
9. The Terrorism Research Center, Inc., North Virginia, USA
www.terrorism.com/
10. Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism, USA
www.mipt.org
11. Anti-Defamation League, USA
www.adl.org/ict
12. Asia Pacific Institute, American Foreign Policy Council, USA
www.afpc.org
13. Inter-American Committee against Terrorism
www.cicte.oas.org
14. RAND Corporation, USA
www.rand.org/terrorism_area
15. Washington Institute, Washington D.C., USA
www.washingtoninstitute.org 
16. Foreign Policy in Focus, USA
www.fpif.org/indices/topics/terrorism
19. Cato Institute, USA
www.cato.org
20. International Crisis Group
www.intl-crisis-group.org
21. Institute for International Studies, Stanford University
http://cisac.stanford.edu/docs/nuclearterrorism.html
22. Center for Defense and International Security Studies, Lancaster, UK
www.cdiss.org
 

Back to top

*Paper to be presented on the occasion of brainstorming session of PPSCR-RCSS Research Project “Database on Terrorist and Violent Conflicts in South Asia” held in Karachi on January 5, 2004.
** Researcher, PPSCR-RCSS research project “Database on terrorist and violent conflicts in South Asia.”


All content on this web site is the property of RCSS & PPSCR, and is only meant for academic purposes, using this web site means that you agree to all terms and conditions. for more info please contact info@ribt.org or webmaster: webmaster@ribt.org