![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||
WESTERN
SAHARAN CONFLICT AND THE ROLE OF
ORGANIZATION OF AFRICAN UNITY (OAU) BY SYEDA BINISH QADRI* INTRODUCTION
Western Sahara is situated
in northern Africa and bordering the Atlantic Ocean between
Mauritania and Morocco. This territory stands out as, ostensibly,
Africa's last colony. For more than three decades, the question of
Western Sahara's independence has remained unanswered, and the
conflict has become a forgotten and neglected international
crisis. The chief economic asset of the area is rich phosphate
deposits. Historical
background
In1884 Spain occupied Western Sahara
during the colonial era. Later to be known as the Western Sahara
(named by the UN in 1975) according to the Berlin conference which
divided up Africa between the colonial powers. Spanish
colonization was limited to these two coastal areas.
In 1906 war between the Saharawi population and Spanish
colonial power began. In 1934 the Saharawi resistance was defeated
by France after twenty eight years of continuous war. In 1956
Morocco began claiming that territory. In 1960 the Saharawi
population became progressively sedentary and started exploiting
the rich phosphate deposits.
In1973 POLISARIO, the Frente Popular
para la Liberacion de Saguia el-Hamray de Rio de Oro - better
known as the POLISARIO Front - was established to engage in the
struggle for independence. The Saharawi liberation movement was
formed to speed up the slow process of decolonization by waging a
guerrilla war against the Spanish. The same year King Hassam II of
Morocco started officially claiming the territory to the North and
Mauritania continues claiming territory to the south.
Thereafter, Mauritania and Morocco
invaded that territory. In 1975 Morocco started a "Green
March" of 350,000 people as a means of advancing their army
into the Western Sahara. Moroccan forces entered the north west of
the territory. In 1975 Mauritania abandoned its territorial claims
in the south and recognized the rights of the Saharawi people by
signing a peace agreement.
In 1985 there had been a ceasefire
between POLISARIO and Morocco. Currently, Western Sahara is under
Morocco's occupation. Justification for the 1976 invasion by
Morocco and Mauritania was based on the argument that,
historically, the people of Western Sahara fell under the
protection of the Moroccan King. Morocco referred the matter to
the International Court of Justice (ICJ) for legal advice.
On 15 October 1975, the opinion of
the International Court was that any foreign occupation of Western
Sahara would be inconsistent with international law, and
therefore, the people of that territory were entitled to
independence. In other words, the occupation of Western Sahara by
Morocco or Mauritania would be contrary to historical facts and
would run counter to international law. The
role of the OAU in resolving the conflict
Since the early 1970s, the OAU has
called for Western Saharan self-determination and has persistently
supported the idea of a referendum. In 1983, the OAU Summit passed
a resolution (AHG 104) that called for direct talks between
Morocco and the Polisario Front. In addition, the UN General
Assembly passed a resolution (40/50) and also called for direct
talks between the two parties. The Secretary General and the
Chairman of the OAU acting jointly under the auspices of the
General Assembly had induced the representatives of Morocco and
the Polisario to negotiate the details of a peace plan. The aim of
the talks was to end hostilities and set the stage for a
referendum. A series of diplomatic meetings, facilitated by both
the OAU and the UN were held. The UN-OAU settlement agreement,
which proposed a six month transition period, had the following
key stipulations: •
A ceasefire and exchange of prisoners; •
A reduction of Moroccan troops from 100,000 to 65,000; disarmament
and confinement of troops to designated areas; •
The return of about 120,000 Saharan refugees from Algeria and
Mauritania; •
The identification and registration of voters, and the
organization of a referendum following a campaign period of three
weeks; •
The withdrawal of Moroccan soldiers or the demobilization of the
Polisario Front, depending on the outcome of the vote.
Following the signing of the
agreement, the Security Council adopted a resolution to establish
the UN Mission for the Referendum in Western Sahara (MINURSO). In
September 1991, MINURSO began its activities with about 200 UN
military observers. The referendum was expected to take place in
January 1992. However, the process was to suffer a number of
setbacks that resulted in its postponement to 31 October 2000.
For the OAU the issue for several
years was so divisive as to threaten the organization’s
continued viability. After the OAU seated a polisario delegation
in 1982, more than one-third of the member governments threatened
to boycott meetings or withdraw from membership. It was the hard
time to OAU.
Security Council extends mandate of
Western Sahara mission (31/07/2003) The Security Council,
stressing that a political solution was critically needed in the
settlement of the dispute over Western Sahara, given the lack of
progress, extended the mandate of the United Nations Mission for
the Referendum there (MINURSO) until 31 October 2003 and called on
the parties to work with the United Nations and with each other
towards acceptance and implementation of the “Peace plan”.
After 30 years of enduring conflict,
the independence of Western Sahara remains first and foremost an
issue of international law. Few options, except a referendum, can
break the stalemate. But the successful example of decolonization
in East Timor may not be emulated in Western Sahara. Morocco
maintains its uncompromising position to preserve the rich
resources of the territory and to ensure the internal stability of
the kingdom. The US, having gone to war in Iraq ostensibly to
enforce UN resolutions, looks on while its former Secretary of
State facilitates Morocco's ongoing defiance of UN resolutions in
Western Sahara. CONCLUSION
The experience over the last few years of Africa in
general, and the OAU in particular, gives us hope for the future
of the continent and its capacity to prevent, manage and resolve
conflicts.
The OAU's lack of resources, especially financially, will
deny it the freedom to unilaterally decide on the strategic,
tactical and operational aspects of peace operations which it may
wish to initiate. The OAU, through its mechanism, clearly has an
increasingly important role to play in the management of conflict
on this continent. The flexibility of the entire process and
cooperation between the UN and OAU are factors facilitating the
eventual settlement of a long and bitter dispute.
*STUDENT, M.A.(PREVIOUS) DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF KARACHI
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
All content (C) Department of International Relations, Karachi University |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Website designed and maintained by Techdorado Web Technologies Inc. |
||||||||||||||||||||||