RECOMMENDATIONS
OF TWO-DAY WORKSHIP
THEME:
RESTRUCTURING OF SAARC
HELD
ON MARCH 30-31, 2010 AND ORGANIZED BY
THE
PROGRAM ON PEACE STUDIES AND CONFLICT REOSLUTION,
DEPARTMENT
OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF
KARACHI
AND THE HANNS SEIDEL FOUNDATION, ISLAMABAD
BACKGROUND
A
two-day workshop on Restructuring of SAARC was held on March 30-31,
2010 at the HEJ Auditorium, University of Karachi. The workshop concluded
with a panel discussion which was participated by the following panelists:
- Ambassador
Nihal Rodrigo, former Secretary General of SAARC and currently adviser
on foreign affairs to the Government of Sri Lanka.
- Ambassador
Shamshad Ahmed, former Foreign Secretary, Government of Pakistan.
- Prof.
Dr. Moonis Ahmar, Chair, Department of International Relations,
University of Karachi and Director, Program on Peace Studies and
Conflict Resolution.
- Dr.
Maqsudul Hasan Nuri, Acting President, Islamabad Policy Research
Institute, Islamabad.
- Dr.
Shaheen Akhtar, Senior Research Analyst, The Institute of Regional
Studies, Islamabad.
- Prof.
Dr. P. Sahadevan, South Asia Studies Division, School of International
Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi.
- Dr.
Shaheen Afroze, Director Research, Bangladesh Institute of Strategic
and International Studies, Dhaka.
- Prof.
Sumansari Liyanage, Department of Economics, University of Peradeniya,
Sri Lanka.
- Dr.
Nischal Pandey, Director, Center for South Asian Studies, Kathmandu,
Nepal.
- Ms.
Zaib Zaheer, Assistant Director South Asia Division, Ministry of
Foreign Affairs, Islamabad.
The
panel discussion, which was chaired by Ambassador Shamshad Ahmed Khan
discussed in detail different issues which impeded the progress of
SAARC as a viable regional organization and presented some of the
ideas which could help transform SAARC as a functional organization.
Based on the discussion held at the two-day workshop and the deliberations
of the panel discussion, following draft recommendations are hereby
presented covering broad themes of regional cooperation in South Asia:-
1)
CONCEPTUAL
A.
Pragmatic and result-oriented approach in order to make SAARC functional
is required. Re-writing of the Charter of SAARC is also necessary
so as to accommodate important changes which have occurred in South
Asia since the inception of SAARC around quarter of a century ago.
B.
Cooperative security framework to galvanize the role of SAARC should
be pursued by regional countries.
C. Restructuring can take place in phases with an emphasis on reforming
the structure and functioning of SAARC.
II)
FUNCTIONAL
A. Secretary General of SAARC should be of a high stature and needs
to be accountable to the organization and not to his/her government.
SAARC Secretariat needs to be expanded and made more impressive in
terms of infrastructure, offering of services and organizational strength.
B.
On substantive issues, unanimity may be required but on other issues
decisions can be made with simple majority.
C. Implementation of vision and goals of SAARC so that so that its
credibility gap is bridged and the regional organization is taken
more seriously inside and outside the region.
III)
ATTITUDE – BEHAVIOR
A. There is a need to change the mindset both at the governmental
and non-governmental level in South Asia so that a positive attitude
and behavior on dealing with critical issues faced by the region could
be adopted.
B. Idea based approach needs to be replaced with result oriented approach
by reducing restrictions on the free movement of people, goods, services
and capital in a reasonable period of time.
C. Professional and serious approach needs to be pursued so that obstacles
which exist for accelerating the process of regional cooperation are
removed by undertaking incremental measures.
IV)
MISCELLANEOUS
A. There is a need for more cultural connectivity in South Asia so
that mistrust, suspicions and paranoia which obstruct the progress
of SAARC are reduced.
B. Priorities of SAARC need to be changed as the emphasis should be
on cooperation in trade, energy, water and other areas of human security.
C. SAARC need to allocate more resources for projects on infrastructure
development.